Skip to main content

A complain by spouse is tantamount to cruelty|पति या पत्नी द्वारा की गई शिकायत क्रूरता के समान है



 

Arti Pandey Vs Vishnu Kant Tiwari

The appellant (wife) is seeking a divorce from her husband, alleging cruelty and desertion. 

The marital life was not happy from the start and the parties have been living separately since 2005. 

The husband argues that the wife could not adjust to living in a rural area and took a conscious decision to break the marital tie permanently. The wife filed several complaints against the husband with various authorities and wrote letters with the intention of destroying his career. 

The court finds that the wife's conduct towards the husband amounts to cruelty and allows the appeal for divorce. 

The court also rejected the argument that the failure of the authorities to take action on the wife's complaints renders them meaningless and emphasized that the impact of the conduct on the complaining spouse in the context of their standard of living is relevant to determining cruelty.

******************************************************************

आरती पांडे बनाम विष्णु कांत तिवारी

अपीलकर्ता (पत्नी) क्रूरता और परित्याग का आरोप लगाते हुए अपने पति से तलाक की मांग कर रही है।

वैवाहिक जीवन शुरू से ही सुखी नहीं था और पक्षकार 2005 से अलग-अलग रह रहे हैं।

पति का तर्क है कि पत्नी एक ग्रामीण क्षेत्र में रहने के लिए समायोजित नहीं हो सकी और वैवाहिक बंधन को स्थायी रूप से तोड़ने का एक सचेत निर्णय लिया। पत्नी ने पति के खिलाफ विभिन्न अधिकारियों के पास कई शिकायतें दर्ज कराईं और उसके करियर को नष्ट करने के इरादे से पत्र लिखे।

अदालत ने पाया कि पति के प्रति पत्नी का आचरण क्रूरता की श्रेणी में आता है और तलाक की अपील की अनुमति देता है।

अदालत ने इस तर्क को भी खारिज कर दिया कि पत्नी की शिकायतों पर कार्रवाई करने में अधिकारियों की विफलता उन्हें अर्थहीन बना देती है और इस बात पर जोर दिया कि शिकायत करने वाले पति या पत्नी पर उनके जीवन स्तर के संदर्भ में आचरण का प्रभाव क्रूरता का निर्धारण करने के लिए प्रासंगिक है।


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Provisional bail, interim bail, anticipatory bail, and regular bail are four types of bail that can be granted to an accused person in criminal proceedings. The main differences between the four are: Purpose: Provisional bail is granted to an accused person who requires temporary release for a specific purpose, such as to attend a wedding, funeral, or medical treatment. Interim bail is granted to an accused person who is seeking regular bail, but the regular bail application is not yet heard or decided. Anticipatory bail is granted to a person who apprehends arrest in a non-bailable offence. Regular bail is granted to an accused person who has been arrested and is in custody. Timeframe: Provisional bail is granted for a specific period of time, usually for the duration of the event for which it was granted. Interim bail is granted for a short period of time until a regular bail application is filed or decided. Anticipatory bail remains in force until the end of the trial or until it is...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man's struggle against domestic violence

  A man's struggle against domestic violence, Is a battle fought with much defiance, Against a world that sees him with silence, And a society that labels him with violence. He climbs a hill that's steep and tough, Where every step is a fight and rough, Yet he must climb, for he knows enough, That he must stand strong and not give up. Men are human too, this we must remember, They too feel pain, and their love they render, To those who are close, in every endeavor, But often their pleas go unheard, forever. For courts and laws, men's rights have no thrill, They must fight alone, with their iron will, Against false allegations and abuse that kill, Their spirit and their soul, leaving them still. Yet they must fight, for they know it's right, To stand for justice, and put up a fight, To protect their dignity, and their life's light, For they too are humans, and deserve what's right. In silence he suffers, with no one to tell, His heart filled with bruises, his sou...
Post a Comment
Read more

Biasness against men in the Indian justice system|आपराधिक न्याय प्रणाली में पुरुषों के प्रति कितना पक्षपात है

The family court system is a complex and often stressful arena for all parties involved, but it can be particularly challenging for men. Despite being half of the population and parents in many families, men can face systemic bias and discrimination in the family court system. Bias against fathers in custody battles: In many family court cases, fathers can face a bias that assumes they are less capable or less committed to being primary caregivers for their children. This can result in unfair parenting arrangements and a decreased relationship with their children. Stereotyping of fathers as abusive or absent: Men can be unfairly characterized as abusive or absent in the family court system, leading to biased decisions and a lack of attention to their positive contributions as fathers. Burden of proof in domestic violence cases: In cases of domestic violence, men can face a high burden of proof, leading to an assumption of guilt and difficulty in presenting their side of the story. Li...
2 comments
Read more