Skip to main content

Even though a Man was outside India still Rape case was filed against him | भले ही एक आदमी भारत से बाहर था फिर भी उसके खिलाफ बलात्कार का मामला दर्ज किया गया




Manish v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. 

This is an application for a preliminary inquiry under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in India, in order to launch a complaint against certain individuals under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. 

The Court passed an order to gather original records and proceedings related to a B summary report that was decided on December 15, 2020. 

The court mentions that according to the ruling in Union of India and others v/s. Haresh Milani 2017(4) Mh.L.J.441, it is not necessary to hear the other side while making a preliminary inquiry. 

The inquiry is being made in relation to an incident where the informant claims they were raped by the applicant and another individual under the promise of a job as a receptionist in a hotel. The investigation revealed that the applicant was not in the country on the date of the alleged incident, and the other individual was not present at the location of the alleged incident.

**********************************************************************************

मनीष बनाम। महाराष्ट्र राज्य और अन्य।

यह भारतीय दंड संहिता की विभिन्न धाराओं के तहत कुछ व्यक्तियों के खिलाफ शिकायत शुरू करने के लिए भारत में दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 की धारा 340 के तहत प्रारंभिक जांच के लिए एक आवेदन है।

कोर्ट ने 15 दिसंबर, 2020 को तय की गई बी सारांश रिपोर्ट से संबंधित मूल रिकॉर्ड और कार्यवाही को इकट्ठा करने का आदेश पारित किया।

अदालत ने उल्लेख किया है कि भारत संघ और अन्य v/s में शासन के अनुसार। हरेश मिलानी 2017(4) एमएच.एल.जे.441, प्रारंभिक जांच करते समय दूसरे पक्ष को सुनना जरूरी नहीं है।

पूछताछ एक ऐसी घटना के संबंध में की जा रही है जहां मुखबिर का दावा है कि एक होटल में रिसेप्शनिस्ट के रूप में नौकरी के वादे के तहत आवेदक और एक अन्य व्यक्ति द्वारा उनके साथ बलात्कार किया गया था। जांच से पता चला कि कथित घटना के दिन आवेदक देश में नहीं था, और अन्य व्यक्ति कथित घटना के स्थान पर मौजूद नहीं था।

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Provisional bail, interim bail, anticipatory bail, and regular bail are four types of bail that can be granted to an accused person in criminal proceedings. The main differences between the four are: Purpose: Provisional bail is granted to an accused person who requires temporary release for a specific purpose, such as to attend a wedding, funeral, or medical treatment. Interim bail is granted to an accused person who is seeking regular bail, but the regular bail application is not yet heard or decided. Anticipatory bail is granted to a person who apprehends arrest in a non-bailable offence. Regular bail is granted to an accused person who has been arrested and is in custody. Timeframe: Provisional bail is granted for a specific period of time, usually for the duration of the event for which it was granted. Interim bail is granted for a short period of time until a regular bail application is filed or decided. Anticipatory bail remains in force until the end of the trial or until it is...

A man's struggle against domestic violence

  A man's struggle against domestic violence, Is a battle fought with much defiance, Against a world that sees him with silence, And a society that labels him with violence. He climbs a hill that's steep and tough, Where every step is a fight and rough, Yet he must climb, for he knows enough, That he must stand strong and not give up. Men are human too, this we must remember, They too feel pain, and their love they render, To those who are close, in every endeavor, But often their pleas go unheard, forever. For courts and laws, men's rights have no thrill, They must fight alone, with their iron will, Against false allegations and abuse that kill, Their spirit and their soul, leaving them still. Yet they must fight, for they know it's right, To stand for justice, and put up a fight, To protect their dignity, and their life's light, For they too are humans, and deserve what's right. In silence he suffers, with no one to tell, His heart filled with bruises, his sou...

Biasness against men in the Indian justice system|आपराधिक न्याय प्रणाली में पुरुषों के प्रति कितना पक्षपात है

The family court system is a complex and often stressful arena for all parties involved, but it can be particularly challenging for men. Despite being half of the population and parents in many families, men can face systemic bias and discrimination in the family court system. Bias against fathers in custody battles: In many family court cases, fathers can face a bias that assumes they are less capable or less committed to being primary caregivers for their children. This can result in unfair parenting arrangements and a decreased relationship with their children. Stereotyping of fathers as abusive or absent: Men can be unfairly characterized as abusive or absent in the family court system, leading to biased decisions and a lack of attention to their positive contributions as fathers. Burden of proof in domestic violence cases: In cases of domestic violence, men can face a high burden of proof, leading to an assumption of guilt and difficulty in presenting their side of the story. Li...