Questions , Answers and landmark judgements on Rape cases |बलात्कार के मामलों पर सवाल, जवाब और ऐतिहासिक फैसले
What is Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code?
Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines the offense of rape and provides for punishment for the same. It specifies that a person who has sexual intercourse with a woman against her will or without her consent, or with a woman who is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the act, can be held guilty of the offense of rape.
What is the punishment for rape under Section 376 of the IPC?
The punishment for rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is imprisonment for a term that shall not be less than seven years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. In cases of repeat offenders or gang rape, the punishment is imprisonment for life, or death.
Is marital rape a crime under Section 376 of the IPC?
Marital rape was not recognized as a criminal offense under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) until recently. Prior to the amendment of the IPC in 2013, Section 375 of the IPC excluded marital rape from the definition of rape. However, after the amendment, the exception in Section 375 that excluded marital rape was removed, making it clear that marital rape can be considered an offense under the IPC.
What is the definition of consent under Section 376 of the IPC?
The definition of consent under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is defined as an unequivocal voluntary agreement when the woman by words, gestures, or any form of verbal or non-verbal communication, communicates willingness to participate in the specific sexual act. In cases where the victim is a minor, or is mentally or physically disabled, or is under the influence of alcohol or drugs, consent is not considered valid. Additionally, consent obtained through force, threat, or intimidation is also not considered valid.
Can a false complaint of rape be filed under Section 376 of the IPC?
Yes, a false complaint of rape can be filed under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). However, it is important to note that making false accusations of rape is a criminal offense in itself and can lead to serious consequences, including imprisonment. Under Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), false complaint of an offense is considered an offense of giving false information and is punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years or with fine or both.
Is there a time limit to file a complaint under Section 376 of the IPC?
There is no specific time limit specified in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for filing a complaint under Section 376 (rape). However, it is generally advised to file a complaint as soon as possible, preferably within a few days of the incident, as the earlier the complaint is made, the easier it is to gather evidence and build a strong case. The statute of limitations for filing a complaint under Section 376 is generally three years, but in exceptional circumstances, the court may take cognizance of the offense even after the lapse of the three-year period.
What is the difference between Section 376 and Section 375 of the IPC?
Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines the offense of rape and provides the essential ingredients of the offense. It states that a man is said to commit rape if he has sexual intercourse with a woman against her will, or without her consent, or with a woman who is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the act.
On the other hand, Section 376 provides for the punishment for the offense of rape defined in Section 375. It specifies the minimum and maximum punishment for the offense of rape, which can range from a minimum of seven years' imprisonment to life imprisonment or death in certain cases.
In short, Section 375 defines what constitutes the offense of rape, while Section 376 provides for the punishment for the same.
Some landmark judgements on Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Supreme Court of India are:
Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi, 2009: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the IPC, which criminalizes homosexuality.
State of Maharashtra vs. Chaman Lal, 2016: The Supreme Court held that mere sexual intercourse with the consent of a woman does not amount to rape, if the man believed in good faith that the woman was his wife.
Rajesh Sharma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2017: The Supreme Court held that the sole testimony of the rape survivor is sufficient to convict the accused.
Shakti Vahini vs. Union of India, 2018: The Supreme Court laid down guidelines for the protection of minors from sexual abuse, including the setting up of special courts and fast-track trials.
Prajwala vs. Union of India, 2018: The Supreme Court directed the government to set up a permanent mechanism to prevent the proliferation of sexual abuse videos on the internet.
***********HINDI**************HINDI************************************

Comments
Post a Comment