Skip to main content

Party seeking changes in the Maintenance order|अनुरक्षण आदेश में परिवर्तन की मांग करने वाला पक्ष

This petition is challenging an order passed by a trial court in a case involving maintenance for a respondent wife under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The petitioner, who is the husband in this case, is contesting the order on the grounds that the trial court did not properly assess the income of both parties and instead based the maintenance amount on the husband's qualifications and experience as an engineer, ignoring the qualifications and experience of the wife as an advocate and notary public. 

The petitioner argues that it was the duty of the trial court to assess the income of both parties and not simply fix the maintenance amount based on the husband's qualifications, and that the court also ignored the fact that the wife's previous application for maintenance had been dismissed by a previous court after taking into account the material presented.


यह याचिका निचली अदालत द्वारा प्रतिवादी पत्नी के भरण-पोषण से जुड़े एक मामले में पारित आदेश को चुनौती दे रही है हिंदू विवाह अधिनियम, 1955। याचिकाकर्ता, जो इस मामले में पति है, इस आधार पर आदेश का विरोध कर रहा है कि ट्रायल कोर्ट ने दोनों पक्षों की आय का ठीक से आकलन नहीं किया और इसके बजाय पति की योग्यता के आधार पर भरण-पोषण की राशि का निर्धारण किया और एक वकील और नोटरी पब्लिक के रूप में पत्नी की योग्यता और अनुभव की अनदेखी करते हुए एक इंजीनियर के रूप में अनुभव।

याचिकाकर्ता का तर्क है कि ट्रायल कोर्ट का यह कर्तव्य था कि वह दोनों पक्षों की आय का आकलन करे और केवल रखरखाव को ठीक न करे पति की योग्यता के आधार पर राशि, और यह कि अदालत ने इस तथ्य को भी नज़रअंदाज़ कर दिया कि पत्नी का पिछला आवेदन रखरखाव के लिए प्रस्तुत सामग्री को ध्यान में रखते हुए पिछले न्यायालय द्वारा खारिज कर दिया गया था। 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Provisional bail, interim bail, anticipatory bail, and regular bail are four types of bail that can be granted to an accused person in criminal proceedings. The main differences between the four are: Purpose: Provisional bail is granted to an accused person who requires temporary release for a specific purpose, such as to attend a wedding, funeral, or medical treatment. Interim bail is granted to an accused person who is seeking regular bail, but the regular bail application is not yet heard or decided. Anticipatory bail is granted to a person who apprehends arrest in a non-bailable offence. Regular bail is granted to an accused person who has been arrested and is in custody. Timeframe: Provisional bail is granted for a specific period of time, usually for the duration of the event for which it was granted. Interim bail is granted for a short period of time until a regular bail application is filed or decided. Anticipatory bail remains in force until the end of the trial or until it is...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man's struggle against domestic violence

  A man's struggle against domestic violence, Is a battle fought with much defiance, Against a world that sees him with silence, And a society that labels him with violence. He climbs a hill that's steep and tough, Where every step is a fight and rough, Yet he must climb, for he knows enough, That he must stand strong and not give up. Men are human too, this we must remember, They too feel pain, and their love they render, To those who are close, in every endeavor, But often their pleas go unheard, forever. For courts and laws, men's rights have no thrill, They must fight alone, with their iron will, Against false allegations and abuse that kill, Their spirit and their soul, leaving them still. Yet they must fight, for they know it's right, To stand for justice, and put up a fight, To protect their dignity, and their life's light, For they too are humans, and deserve what's right. In silence he suffers, with no one to tell, His heart filled with bruises, his sou...
Post a Comment
Read more

Biasness against men in the Indian justice system|आपराधिक न्याय प्रणाली में पुरुषों के प्रति कितना पक्षपात है

The family court system is a complex and often stressful arena for all parties involved, but it can be particularly challenging for men. Despite being half of the population and parents in many families, men can face systemic bias and discrimination in the family court system. Bias against fathers in custody battles: In many family court cases, fathers can face a bias that assumes they are less capable or less committed to being primary caregivers for their children. This can result in unfair parenting arrangements and a decreased relationship with their children. Stereotyping of fathers as abusive or absent: Men can be unfairly characterized as abusive or absent in the family court system, leading to biased decisions and a lack of attention to their positive contributions as fathers. Burden of proof in domestic violence cases: In cases of domestic violence, men can face a high burden of proof, leading to an assumption of guilt and difficulty in presenting their side of the story. Li...
2 comments
Read more